Created by Al
González Chimacum, WA
Last updated on Saturday, January 13, 2024
Intro || Task || Process || Resources || Evaluation ||
Conclusion
Here are our sample student websites.
Introduction:
One of the
strongest earthquakes to hit our planet in this century caused a series of tsunamis
that ravaged the coasts of India, Thailand and
many Indonesian islands. The destruction and loss
of life was so catastrophic that the whole world
stood in shock at the sheer power of nature. Many
are worried that this could happen again, somewhere
else. Maybe at a coast near you.
Seven years after the Asian Tsunami of 2004 another massive earthquake off the coast of Japan ravaged that nation with another deadly tsunami. Then in 2022 a huge volcanic eruption near Tonga caused another humungous tsunami.
Bauunda Aceh, Indonesia before the tsunami hit. |
Banda Aceh, Indonesia after the tsunami. |
Japan's 2011 Tsunami photos:
Your
Task: Your job is to report on what
happened as a result of these particular tsunamis.
The question that you need to answer as a journalist
is this, how can an earthquake, or volcanic eruption, cause a tsunami? Choose
between creating a Google Slides presentation or an article written on Google Docs to share your report on your website eportfolio.
Process:
Step 1:
You will begin by learning as much as you can
about tsunamis and especially
the 2004 Asian Tsunami, the 2011 Japan Tsunami, and the 2022 Tonga Tsunami. Use
the following resources to
accomplish your task.
Step
2:
Next, use your Science notebook
to write down notes on the causes of tsunamis, and about the Asian, Japan, and Tonga tsunamis.
Read
about summarizing
vs paraphrasing to help you take
notes. (Use the Back button on the top left to return
to this page.) Step
3:
Once
you are done taking notes, you can start drafting your article or presentation.
Step
4:
Storyboard, which means organize,
your presentation, webpage or news report so that it will make sense to your reader. Here is a Google Slides
presentation on the purpose of Storyboarding. Here is
a storyboard rubric with scoring
guide so that you can
do the best job possible. Remember, the better your storyboard,
the better your final product.
Use the following
Science Article Writing Chatbot for
help writing your final copy.
Step
5:
Create
your final product!
Resources:
Your Ship's Tsunami AI
If you get confused by the resources below or if you want to check that you understand what you are reading and learning, consult our starship's Tsunami AI consultant.
Tonga Tsunami
Start by working through this Pear Deck to learn about the 2022 Tonga Tsunami.
Articles:
- "Tsunami facts: check out the mighty wave!" from National Geographic Kids provides general information about tsunamis, how they form, and their potential size.
- "Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004" from Britannica Kids provides detailed information about the 2004 Asian Tsunami, including its causes, the damage it caused, and its aftermath.
- "Japan earthquake and tsunami of 2011" from Britannica Kids provides comprehensive information about the 2011 Japan Tsunami, including its causes, the damage it caused, and its aftermath.
- "Earth Science for Kids" from Ducksters provides general information about tsunamis, including how they form and the damage they can cause.
- "The Asian tsunami" from Kiddle provides detailed information about the 2004 Asian Tsunami, including its causes, the damage it caused, and its aftermath.
- "Earthquake" from Kiddle provides detailed information about the 2011 Japan Tsunami, including its causes, the damage it caused, and its aftermath.
Videos:
Additional Resources:
Use the following Science Article Writing Chatbot for help writing your final copy
Evaluation:
Rubric: Use
the following rubrics to score your final product.
Here is a research rubric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes are recorded and
organized in an extremely neat and orderly fashion.
|
Notes are recorded legibly
and are somewhat organized.
|
Notes are recorded.
|
Notes are recorded only
with peer/teacher assistance and reminders.
|
|
Successfully uses suggested
internet links to find information and navigates
within these sites easily without assistance.
|
Usually able to use suggested
internet links to find information and navigates
within these sites easily without assistance.
|
Occasionally able to use
suggested internet links to find information
and navigates within these sites easily without
assistance.
|
Needs assistance or supervision
to use suggested internet links and/or to navigate
within these sites.
|
|
Information clearly relates
to the main topic. It includes several supporting
details and/or examples.
|
Information clearly relates
to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting
details and/or examples.
|
Information clearly relates
to the main topic. No details and/or examples
are given.
|
Information has little
or nothing to do with the main topic.
|
|
All topics are addressed
and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences
about each.
|
All topics are addressed
and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences
about each.
|
All topics are addressed,
and most questions answered with 1 sentence about
each.
|
One or more topics were
not addressed.
|
|
Information is very organized
with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings.
|
Information is organized
with well-constructed paragraphs.
|
Information is organized,
but paragraphs are not well-constructed.
|
The information is disorganized.
|
18 to 20 =
Excellent researching, 14 to 17 = Good researching,
12 to 13 = Your research needs work, 11 or
less = You need to redo your research
Slides/Report
Rubric
Website Rubric
SELF EVALUATION:
Answer the
following questions:
•How did you use your class time? Briefly describe
your daily activities.
•How did you work with your team?
•Did you share information and responsibilities?
•Describe how you broke up the responsibilities.
•If you were to do this same project again, what
would you do differently? What would make this a more
meaningful activity for you?
Rate
yourself on the following Teamwork Skills rubric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routinely provides useful
ideas when participating in the group and in
classroom discussion. A definite leader who contributes
a lot of effort.
|
Usually provides useful
ideas when participating in the group and in
classroom discussion. A strong group member who
tries hard!
|
Sometimes provides useful
ideas when participating in the group and in
classroom discussion. A satisfactory group member
who does what is required.
|
Rarely provides useful
ideas when participating in the group and in
classroom discussion. May refuse to participate.
|
|
Provides work of the highest
quality.
|
Provides high quality
work.
|
Provides work that occasionally
needs to be checked/redone by other group members
to ensure quality.
|
Provides work that usually
needs to be checked/redone by others to ensure
quality.
|
|
Routinely uses time well
throughout the project to ensure things get done
on time. Group does not have to adjust deadlines
or work responsibilities because of this person's
procrastination.
|
Usually uses time well
throughout the project, but may have procrastinated
on one thing. Group does not have to adjust deadlines
or work responsibilities because of this person's
procrastination.
|
Tends to procrastinate,
but always gets things done by the deadlines.
Group does not have to adjust deadlines or work
responsibilities because of this person's procrastination.
|
Rarely gets things done
by the deadlines AND group has to adjust deadlines
or work responsibilities because of this person's
inadequate time management.
|
|
Almost always listens
to, shares with, and supports the efforts of
others. Tries to keep people working well together.
|
Usually listens to, shares,
with, and supports the efforts of others. Does
not cause "waves" in the group.
|
Often listens to, shares
with, and supports the efforts of others, but
sometimes is not a good team member.
|
Rarely listens to, shares
with, and supports the efforts of others. Often
is not a good team player.
|
|
Routinely monitors the
effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions
to make it more effective.
|
Routinely monitors the
effectiveness of the group and works to make
the group more effective.
|
Occasionally monitors
the effectiveness of the group and works to make
the group more effective.
|
Rarely monitors the effectiveness
of the group and does not work to make it more
effective.
|
18
to 20 = Excellent team member, 14 to 17 = Good
team member, 12 to 13 =
You need to work on being a better team member, 11
or less =
You are a poor team member
Conclusion: Thank
you for reporting on these horrible tragedies. Now others
can learn what happened in 2004, 2011, and 2022 and at the same time
learn a little about earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis. By
learning about the awesome force of nature and seeing
what can happen to people we learn respect for nature
and for those affected by nature. You learned what
causes earthquakes and how special circumstances
can lead to tsunamis. But those tsunamis weren't the
last acts of nature to cause destruction. Follow up
on what you learned here by learning about hurricanes,
such as Katrina, or about volcanoes, such as Mt.
Saint Helens. Nature can be destructive and constructive
as well. Try and find out how.
|